Scriptural Proof That We Have TWO POPES: Fourth Sunday In Advent Both Annas And Caiaphas, When John Began His Preaching, Were the HIGH PRIESTS


GOSPEL Luke 3:1-6
Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and Philip his brother tetrarch of Iturea, and the country of Trachonitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abilina; Under the high priests Annas and Caiphas; the word of the Lord was made unto John, the son of Zachary, in the desert. And he came into all the country about the Jordan, preaching the baptism of penance for the remission of sins; As it was written in the book of the sayings of Isaias the prophet: A voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight his paths. Every valley shall be filled; and every mountain and hill shall be brought low; and the crooked shall be made straight; and the rough ways plain; And all flesh shall see the salvation of God.

Using Canon Law to proved that the Church cannot have TWO Popes?


Divine Scripture TRUMPS fallible man-made Canon Law.

Not to mention that fact that NON-Canon Lawyers are claiming that Pope Francis is not Pope based on their reading of Canon Law! What nonsense coming from the Laity!



Did you know that God gave the Jews only ONE High Priest to guide the Jews, but later on, God allowed and permitted TWO High Priests to rule the Jews?

Many of you were not paying attention during the Fourth Week of Advent when we are told by St Luke that Under the high priests Annas and Caiphas; the word of the Lord was made unto John, the son of Zachary, in the desert.


Here read from St Bede on the High Priests Annas and Caiaphas:

BEDE. Both Annas and Caiaphas, when John began his preaching, were the High Priests, but Annas held the office that year, Caiaphas the same year in which our Lord suffered on the cross. Three others had held the office in the intervening time, but these two, as having particular reference to our Lord’s Passion, are mentioned by the Evangelist. For at that time of violence and intrigue, the commands of the Law being no longer in force, the honour of the High Priest’s office was never given to merit or high birth, but the whole affairs of the Priesthood were managed by the Roman power. For Josephus relates, that Valerius Gratus, when Annas was thrust out of the Priesthood, appointed Ismael High Priest, the son of Baphas; but not long after casting him off, he put in his place Eleazar the son of the High Priest Ananias. After the space of one year, he expelled him also from the office, and delivered the government of the High Priesthood to a certain Simon, son of Caiaphas, who holding it not longer than a year, had Joseph, whose name also was Caiaphas, for his successor; so that the whole time during which our Lord is related to have taught is included in the space of four years.

Not only do we have TWO High Priests Annas and Caiphas; when the word of the Lord was made unto John, the son of Zachary, in the desert

We also have the same TWO High Priests Annas and Caiphas sitting in Judgment of Christ during His Passion!

Two events recorded by the Evangelists telling us that there were TWO High Priests not just one.

So using Divine Scripture we have see that there can be TWO POPES to sit in judgment, just as Christ Himself was judged by TWO HIGH PRIESTS.

Again Canon Law is not infallible.

We have TWO POPES: