'HAIL SATAN' Swati Runi Goyal Wears 'HAIL SATAN' T-Shirt On American Airlines Flight - Told By Crew To Cover Up 'Offensive' Logo Or Get Kicked Off The Plane

SATANIST Smarter Than Self-Proclaimed Catholic THOMISTS

In the year 1864, Lucifer together with a large number of demons will be unloosed from hell Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

The demons of the air together with the Antichrist will perform great wonders on earth and in the atmosphere, and men will become more and more perverted. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

For the time has come when the most astonishing wonders will take place on the earth and in the air. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

Our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against Principalities and Powers, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places. Ephesians 6:12

At least this Satanist knows where Satan resides...

Many THOMIST do not know where Satan reside...or they just ignore it, in order to accumulate frequent flyer miles without disturbing their conscience.

Florida woman, 49, wearing a 'HAIL SATAN' t-shirt on American Airlines flight is told by crew to cover up the 'offensive' logo or get kicked off the plane

An American Airlines passenger wearing a 'HAIL SATAN' t-shirt was told by crew members on her flight to cover up the top's 'offensive' logo or face being kicked off the plane.   Swati Runi Goyal, 49, who is a member of the Satanic Temple, says she was warned by staff during her flight from Florida to Nevada on October 30 and forced to wear one of her husband's extra layers of clothing to cover up.   She told BuzzFeed News an attendant told her 'our crew has found your shirt to be offensive'. The black t-shirt has HAIL SATAN in all-caps on its front, plus the text: 'Est. 666' and an upside-down cross.  Goyal, from Key West, Florida, said the experience left her feeling 'humiliated', adding: 'We initially just thought it was a joke.   'But he repeated the directive, and there was another female crew member who was behind him with her arms crossed looking very angry.  'The man said "Your shirt is offensive. Do you know what that means?" I said, "I’m a foreign-born minority woman, I understand ‘offensive,’ and this shirt is not offensive".'    Source

SATANIST Smarter Than Self Proclaimed Catholic THOMISTS...

Many do not know this, but flying on commercial aircraft at a cruising altitude of 35,000 ft places one in the Habitat of Demons.  

Most don't care about the opinion of St Thomas Aquinas on this matter - heck - even those who pride themselves as Thomists would rather ignore the words of  St Thomas found in Summa Th. I EN Qu.64 a.4. Article: 4. than to give up their Frequent flyer miles.

Problem with flying on commercial aircraft at a cruising altitude of 35,000 ft?

It violates the boundary established by the Blessed Trinity.

That boundary is 15 cubits above the Mountain Tops or about 29.050 ft.

This 29,050 ft boundary is the same level that the water of the Deluge reached during the time of NOE to cleanse the world of all the works of men - both profane and holy.

This is the same 29,050 ft boundary that the fire of the final conflagration at the end of days  that will  burn up all of the works of men - both profane and holy.

So when you fly above this 29,050 ft boundary - you tempt God.

You can claim ignorance - but that's no excuse.

So modern man will be punished for violating this 29,050 ft boundary.



Here read from St. Thomas Aquinas on where Demons reside...

Article 4. Whether our atmosphere is the demons' place of punishment?

Objection 1. It would seem that this atmosphere is not the demons' place of punishment. For a demon is a spiritual nature. But a spiritual nature is not affected by place. Therefore there is no place of punishment for demons.

Objection 2. Further, man's sin is not graver than the demons'. But man's place of punishment is hell. Much more, therefore, is it the demons' place of punishment; and consequently not the darksome atmosphere.

Objection 3. Further, the demons are punished with the pain of fire. But there is no fire in the darksome atmosphere. Therefore the darksome atmosphere is not the place of punishment for the demons.

On the contrary, Augustine says (Gen. ad lit. iii, 10), that "the darksome atmosphere is as a prison to the demons until the judgment day."

I answer that, The angels in their own nature stand midway between God and men. Now the order of Divine providence so disposes, that it procures the welfare of the inferior orders through the superior. But man's welfare is disposed by Divine providence in two ways: first of all, directly, when a man is brought unto good and withheld from evil; and this is fittingly done through the good angels. In another way, indirectly, as when anyone assailed is exercised by fighting against opposition. It was fitting for this procuring of man's welfare to be brought about through the wicked spirits, lest they should cease to be of service in the natural order. Consequently a twofold place of punishment is due to the demons: one, by reason of their sin, and this is hell; and another, in order that they may tempt men, and thus the darksome atmosphere is their due place of punishment.

Now the procuring of men's salvation is prolonged even to the judgment day: consequently, the ministry of the angels and wrestling with demons endure until then. Hence until then the good angels are sent to us here; and the demons are in this dark atmosphere for our trial: although some of them are even now in hell, to torment those whom they have led astray; just as some of the good angels are with the holy souls in heaven. But after the judgment day all the wicked, both men and angels, will be in hell, and the good in heaven.

Reply to Objection 1. A place is not penal to angel or soul as if affecting the nature by changing it, but as affecting the will by saddening it: because the angel or the soul apprehends that it is in a place not agreeable to its will.

Reply to Objection 2. One soul is not set over another in the order of nature, as the demons are over men in the order of nature; consequently there is no parallel.

Reply to Objection 3. Some have maintained that the pain of sense for demons and souls is postponed until the judgment day: and that the beatitude of the saints is likewise postponed until the judgment day. But this is erroneous, and contrary to the teaching of the Apostle (2 Corinthians 5:1): "If our earthly house of this habitation be dissolved, we have a house in heaven." Others, again, while not admitting the same of souls, admit it as to demons. But it is better to say that the same judgment is passed upon wicked souls and wicked angels, even as on good souls and good angels.

Consequently, it must be said that, although a heavenly place belongs to the glory of the angels, yet their glory is not lessened by their coming to us, for they consider that place to be their own; in the same way as we say that the bishop's honor is not lessened while he is not actually sitting on his throne. In like manner it must be said, that although the demons are not actually bound within the fire of hell while they are in this dark atmosphere, nevertheless their punishment is none the less; because they know that such confinement is their due. Hence it is said in a gloss upon James 3:6: "They carry fire of hell with them wherever they go." Nor is this contrary to what is said (Luke 8:31), "They besought the Lord not to cast them into the abyss"; for they asked for this, deeming it to be a punishment for them to be cast out of a place where they could injure men. Hence it is stated, "They [Vulg. 'He'] besought Him that He would not expel them [Vulg. 'him'] out of the country" (Mark 5:10).